Back to All Events

Prof. Bağcı on Turkey’s NATO Agenda and Global Geopolitic Challanges


Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Bağcı Discusses Turkey’s NATO Agenda and Global Geopolitic Challanges

On July 9, 2024, Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Bağcı, co-founder of Ankara Global Advisory Group, was a featured speaker on the HT 360 hosted by Dilek Gül on Habertürk. The episode centered on NATO’s 75th anniversary and Turkey’s evolving role in the alliance, especially in the context of the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian war and broader geopolitical shifts. Prof. Bağcı provided an in-depth analysis of NATO’s future strategies and Turkey's significant contributions, offering critical insights into defense policies, international cooperation, and security challenges.

Key Takeaways from Prof. Bağcı's Insights on “Turkey’s NATO Agenda”:

  1. Escalation in the Russo-Ukrainian Conflict

    Prof. Bağcı noted that recent Russian attacks, particularly targeting Ukraine’s infrastructure, suggest a deliberate strategy ahead of the NATO summit. He emphasized Russia’s mixed messaging—claiming not to target civilians, while continuing actions that severely damage Ukraine's civilian infrastructure. Bağcı characterized this as a political maneuver, with Russia aiming to weaken Ukraine and send a message to NATO. The introduction of Ukrainian drones into the conflict and the inclusion of Crimea as a battlefield further complicates the situation.

  2. NATO-Russia Relations and the Threat of Nuclear Escalation

    A central concern in Bağcı’s analysis was the potential for Russia to use tactical nuclear weapons under the Gerasimov Doctrine. He underscored that while NATO is prepared to strengthen Ukraine’s defense, there is a strong consensus against direct military engagement with Russia to avoid triggering nuclear conflict. NATO's new Secretary General, Mark Rutte, is expected to pursue a softer diplomatic approach compared to his predecessor, Jens Stoltenberg, but Bağcı stressed that NATO must remain vigilant and proactive in countering Russian aggression.

  3. Focus on Strengthening Ukraine's Military Capabilities

    Prof. Bağcı discussed NATO’s ongoing efforts to bolster Ukraine’s military, particularly through advanced defensive systems such as Patriot missiles provided by Germany. He highlighted NATO’s commitment to reinforcing Ukraine's ability to defend itself, while acknowledging that entering Russian-occupied territories remains highly improbable due to the lack of military willingness from NATO members, including the United States. Strengthening Ukraine’s defenses will likely dominate discussions at the upcoming NATO summit.

  4. Turkey’s Central Role in NATO and Global Security

    Turkey’s status as one of NATO's most important military powers was a key point in Bağcı’s remarks. He emphasized that Turkey’s strategic geographical position makes it indispensable to NATO’s defense strategy, particularly in light of potential NATO expansion into Asia. Bağcı argued that any future engagement with Asian nations, such as Japan and South Korea, would require close cooperation with Turkey. He also noted Turkey's vital role in maintaining stability in the Mediterranean and the Middle East, regions that remain volatile with conflicts in Gaza, Syria, and Lebanon.

  5. Defense Industry Embargoes and EU Relations

    Bağcı raised the issue of unofficial defense embargoes imposed by certain EU member states, particularly Germany and Austria, which have hampered Turkey’s defense capabilities. While these embargoes primarily affect the defense industry, they also reflect broader political tensions between Turkey and the EU. Bağcı pointed to recent improvements in German-Turkish relations, though he noted that significant issues remain unresolved, particularly concerning defense cooperation and technology transfers.

  6. Terrorism as a NATO-Wide Concern

    Terrorism, especially threats originating from northern Syria, remains a critical concern for Turkey, according to Bağcı. He stressed that terrorist activities on Turkey’s borders should be seen as a direct threat to NATO itself, and called for NATO members, particularly the United States, to take a stronger stance against terrorism in the region. Bağcı also noted the importance of addressing Turkey's security concerns in NATO's broader defense strategies, arguing that Turkey's fight against terrorism is central to the alliance's stability.

  7. Future of NATO and the Financial Burden of War

    Finally, Bağcı touched on NATO’s potential expansion into Asia and its shifting role as a global military alliance. He questioned whether NATO is prepared to manage the growing financial burden of supporting Ukraine, as the costs of the war have escalated to trillions of dollars. European countries, especially smaller nations, are feeling the strain of these expenses. Bağcı warned that ongoing military modernization efforts, such as the production of F-35 jets, may further burden NATO members, particularly in the face of growing economic challenges.

Conclusion: Turkey, Crucial in Shaping NATO’s Strategy and Ensuring Global Stability

In light of Hüseyin Bağcı's insights, Turkey emerges as a pivotal force in NATO's strategic landscape. By addressing Russia's escalating threats, reinforcing Ukraine’s defense capabilities, and navigating complex defense industry embargoes, Turkey plays a crucial role in shaping NATO's approach to global security challenges. As NATO adapts to new geopolitical realities, Turkey's contributions are vital in steering the alliance towards enhanced stability and effectiveness on the world stage.


Ankara Global Advisory Group is proud to continue offering thought leadership on key international issues, ensuring that global decision-makers are equipped with the knowledge they need to navigate complex security dynamics.

For a more detailed analysis from Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Bağcı and the latest developments in international relations, continue following updates from Ankara Global Advisory Group.


Previous
Previous
July 9

Prof. Bağcı on Turkey-Syria Relations, NATO, and Global Security

Next
Next
July 26

Prof. Bağcı on Netenyahu and U.S. Elections